Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Reading about guns in America

Monday, March 11th, 2013

From Shelf Awareness:

As the debate about guns has grown following the mass shootings in Aurora, Colo., and Sandy Hook, Conn., last year, the Association of American University Presses has compiled a bibliography of university press scholarship on gun policy, violence, the Second Amendment and more called “Books for Understanding: Guns in America.”

The latest bibliography includes more than 40 works, including:

  • Reducing Gun Violence in America: Informing Policy with Evidence and Analysis, edited by Daniel W. Webster and Jon S. Vernick (Johns Hopkins University Press)
  • Guns, Democracy, and the Insurrectionist Idea by Joshua Horwitz and Casey Anderson (University of Michigan Press)
  • The Bully Society: School Shootings and the Crisis of Bullying in America’s Schools by Jessie Klein (New York University Press)

Book suggestions for the president

Friday, January 18th, 2013

On Moyers & Company, Bill Moyers recently asked viewers to tell him what book they would recommend for President Obama to read as he embarks on his second term. Here are the results (in an annoying slide show, rather than a user-friendly list). Bill’s own suggestion was Paul Krugman’s “End This Depression Now!”

Fiscal cliff?

Tuesday, December 11th, 2012

fiscalcliff

Well, it’s a thought. (This came from Google Plus.)

GOP wins, despite Democrat votes

Friday, November 16th, 2012

stacked-gop

So, you think your vote doesn’t count? Here’s what we tried to warn you about in 2010, following the census. (From Mother Jones)

Four more years

Wednesday, November 7th, 2012

FourMoreYears2

Says it all.

Anti-Obama books are big business

Monday, October 8th, 2012

american-flag-squareFrom The Nation: “The Obama-Bashing Book Bonanza” — excerpts:

Though there were a number of successful books lambasting Bill Clinton during the 1990s, anti-Obama books are a much bigger publishing phenomenon. The conservative publisher Regnery, for example, had one anti-Clinton book hit the top of the Timesbestseller list during the eight years of his presidency. It’s already had four No. 1 anti-Obama books, including Obama’s America. And in the 1990s, Regnery had more of the conservative publishing field to itself; since then, most of the major New York publishing houses have established conservative imprints, which have released their own anti-Obama tomes.

“The publishing industry is pumping out anti-Obama books authored by conservatives in numbers normally reserved for young-adult novels about teenage vampires,” The Washington Times reported in September. “More than 30 nonfiction titles blasting the president have been released by publishers this year, with several more hotly anticipated works expected to hit bookstores before the Nov. 6 election.”

For conservative authors and publishers, a changing marketplace, coupled with the huge rewards for appealing to the anti-Obama animus, are incentives for ever-escalating vitriol. …

It’s no secret, of course, that conservative polemics consistently outsell liberal ones—something confirmed, most recently, by Amazon’s Election Heat Map, which shows that right-wing tomes make up 56 percent of recent political book sales. There are a number of reasons for this. Partly it’s because of the strength of the conservative media in general. “There is a kind of well-defined, conservative parallel-culture media world with Fox News at its center,” but which also includes “many other institutions ranging from talk radio to churches,” says Alex Star, a senior editor at Farrar, Straus & Giroux who previously worked at The New York Times Book Review. “A book can come out and be massively promoted to a niche audience that really wants it.”

There is no comparable progressive media infrastructure. “The disparity in conservative and liberal bestsellers is pretty comparable to the disparity between Fox and MSNBC,” Star notes. Liberals are simply less likely to churn out the sort of partisan red meat that sells on the right: “Conservatives are just more comfortable with really bald, go-for-the-gut polemics than the general liberal left.” …

Presidential campaign books

Wednesday, September 26th, 2012

GameChangeFrom the Los Angeles Times: 12 essential books on presidential campaigns

Right-wing fantasies about the president

Thursday, September 20th, 2012

barackobamapointing

“At the time of this writing, … large numbers of right-wing Americans are lost in fantasies about President Barack Obama. Obama is a stealth Muslim (one-third of conservative Republicans believed this as of August 2010, along with 20 to 25 percent of Americans generally). Obama was not born in the United States (45 percent of Republicans). Obama is a communist who is actively trying to destroy America. Obama wants to set up Nazi-style death panels to euthanize old people. Obama is the Antichrist (in a controversial Harris Poll, 24 percent of Republicans endorsed the statement that Obama “might” be the Antichrist).”

The Storytelling Animal by Jonathan Gottschall

—————————————————

Good lord, and they think WE’RE crazy.

— M.L.

Best reason to vote for Barack Obama

Tuesday, September 18th, 2012

THE BEST REASON TO VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA — This quote from Mitt Romney (source: Mother Jones):

“There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that’s an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what.

lotsofpeople“And, I mean, the president starts off with 48, 49 [percent], he starts with a huge number. These are people who pay no income tax. Forty-seven percent of Americans pay no income tax. So our message of low taxes doesn’t connect. So he’ll be out there talking about tax cuts for the rich. I mean, that’s what they sell every four years.

“And so my job is is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives. What I have to do is convince the five to 10 percent in the center that are independents, that are thoughtful, that look at voting one way or the other depending upon, in some cases, emotion, whether they like the guy or not …”
———————————-
womanandchildrendustbowlOh, man, does he not get it. We don’t pay taxes? Then where does 1/3 of my pay go? I realize what I end up paying in taxes may not seem like a lot to you, Mitt, but it’s a lot to me.

We don’t take responsibility for ourselves? I’ve been working all my life — since I was big enough to walk. Born on a farm, you work on a farm, and you learn to work every day, to earn what you have. No entitlements here — nothing was handed to my farmer father.

After all the deductions, I only take home about $1400 a month. So I sure could use the money they take away for taxes. Could YOU live on $1400 a month, Mittens? That’s why I have three jobs. Not responsible? I’m not responsible?

You see, Mittens, if you’d pay 1/3 of your annual income in taxes, you’d still have more money than most people — and I don’t begrudge you that money. I don’t even mind paying taxes: It’s worth it to me, to have good schools, good roads, decent and affordable health care, and the knowledge that older people who have worked hard all their lives won’t be left on a stoop somewhere to rot. I don’t consider them — or myself —to be “victims.” We’re just Americans. Hard-working Americans.

No, Mittens. I can’t claim $77,000 for a horse as a medical expense. Why? Well, first, because I don’t have $77,000. Or a horse. And if I DID need to claim something as a medical expense, it probably wouldn’t be allowed by the IRS, because I don’t have 27 financial lawyers and auditors helping me find loopholes. And no, I don’t consider it patriotic to find loopholes so you don’t have to pay your taxes.

When I went to college, do you think I borrowed money from my parents? Get real, Mitt. I got scholarships, grants, and low-cost loans, thanks to government as well as private opportunities, and I paid back every cent. I’m not responsible for myself?

barack_obama_44_pres_portrait_official_pres_seal_poster-r6e9423c53a16417287077c92549b38b0_js8_400I’m voting for somebody who understands — who knows what it’s like to struggle, to pay back college loans, to be quietly responsible. Somebody who understands that we’re out there working our butts off every day and just want a good life, just want what’s fair, just want not to get ripped off by bankers and Wall Street, not to get dropped by insurance companies just because our kids got sick or a hurricane hit our house. Somebody who believes that America is the greatest country in the world BECAUSE we take care of our own — because no one should starve to death in America, no child should be left without an education, and no returning veteran should be discarded simply because he or she is no longer on the battlefield.

I’m voting for Barack Obama.

The wandering womb? Hysterical females?

Friday, August 24th, 2012

hystericalwoman

From Lynn Parramore at Alternet: Seven of the Craziest Myths About Female Biology of All Time (This is a MUST READ for women — and so funny, too!)

Bill’s book suggestions

Wednesday, July 18th, 2012

From the website of Moyers and Company: Bill Moyers’ summer reading list

Mary rant

Thursday, July 12th, 2012

money-flag

And they call themselves PATRIOTIC!

<<From The American Prospect: As Mitt Romney comes under withering fire for offshoring his millions to Bermuda and Switzerland—and for refusing to allow light to shine into what the Times calls his “financial black hole”—Senator Lindsey Graham came up with what is surely the year’s most novel line of defense today: “It’s really American to avoid paying taxes, legally.” No doubt, the Romney campaign apparatus was delighted to hear this: Thanks for being so helpful, Lindsey! At least he added that “legally” word. But there was more! “As long as it was legal, I’m OK with it,” Graham said. “I don’t blame anybody for using the tax code to their advantage.” And more still! “It’s a game we play. Every American tries to find the way to get the most deductions they can. I see nothing wrong with playing the game because we set it up to be a game.”>>

A game? A GAME???? They aren’t even charged the percentage of tax that would be fair for their income range, and they’re fighting to maneuver and hide and evade. If I tried to do that, the IRS would swoop in and garnish my wages and throw me in jail.
The truth is, I don’t mind paying MY FAIR SHARE of taxes, because I use the roads and bridges and the post office and the schools and the police and the fire department and the libraries and the public utilities and, because of the Affordable Care Act, I get to take advantage of more preventive care and checkups.

My share of taxes is no doubt a WAY higher percentage of my net worth than their share of taxes is of their net worth. And they’re fighting it all the way, while telling me they’re the job creators (who aren’t creating any jobs) and deserve to be given more tax breaks because they’re the patriotic party. This is disgusting.

One of the reasons we elected Barack Obama — correct me if I’m wrong here — was so that he would get rid of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and return the budget more toward equilibrium. (The budget under Clinton was balanced until Bush gave all the money back to the rich and then started two unpaid wars.) I’m not happy with the Democrats at all for not taking care of this when they were in charge. And I’m not happy that the president is STILL not taking care of this. “Oh, we can’t raise taxes during a recession.”

Who says? The super-rich 1 percent are making out like bandits during the recession. There’s a lot of money to be made when poor people go broke. That money went somewhere. You know perfectly well where it went. And they don’t even want to pay taxes on it. Well, maybe they DON’T use the police and fire departments, or the libraries, or the post office, or the schools, or the roads and bridges, or the public utilities. Maybe that would be fair then.

No wonder there’s an OCCUPY revolution going on.

Health Reform Quiz

Tuesday, July 3rd, 2012

Think you know how the Affordable Care Act will affect Americans? Take the Kaiser Foundation’s Health Reform Quiz. (Full disclosure: I surprised myself by getting 10 out of 10 correct!)

Churches and the Holocaust

Wednesday, June 27th, 2012

From National Catholic Reporter: A book review on Complicity in the Holocaust: Churches and Universities in Nazi Germany by Robert P. Ericksen.

Long live libraries!

Tuesday, June 19th, 2012

library

This is so clever: The Troy Library saves itself by using reverse psychology. You’ve gotta love libraries!

‘Fracked and Burned’

Friday, June 8th, 2012

teapotCaroline Arnold’s excellent column “Fracked and Burned: The Tyranny of the Corporate Tea Party” has been published on the Common Dreams website. Be sure to check out the comments, too.

Struggling along as a millionaire’s wife

Tuesday, June 5th, 2012

I was offended when Ann Romney said she worked hard being a stay-at-home mom and knows “what it’s like to struggle.” Hmmm. While I realize that being a stay-at-home mom can take up all your energy, I would really like to see what she’d do if she had to work as intensely as I have had to, and as many hours, every day, for as many years as I have. Not to mention having to put up with the sexual harassment/innuendo and “glass ceiling” barriers, which is a job in itself.

Here’s a link to a brilliant take on the whole thing from National Catholic Reporter online: By Colman McCarthy

You can follow the plight of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious at the NCR website.

In other news, a nun has been denounced by the Vatican for putting her opinions in a book.

‘I’m rich. Tax me.’

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2012

From The Daily Beast: Best-selling author Stephen King said the megarich have a “moral imperative” to pay higher taxes in America.

The Church vs. women?

Wednesday, April 25th, 2012

From the National Catholic Reporter comes a new blog, “Sisters Under Scrutiny.” The interesting entry from Robert McClory discusses the attitude of the Church toward women:

nundoll“The attitude toward women that prompted the Vatican crackdown on the LCWR was there in the beginning and it’s never been exorcised from Catholicism. It even got into the New Testament, in 1 Corinthians, for example, where the writer declares that women “should keep silence in the churches for they are not permitted to speak but should be subordinate. … If there is anything they desire to know, let them ask their husband.”

Today, we are assured by every credible Scripture scholar that this was inserted by some scribe after Paul’s death; it totally contradicts his attitude toward women and his acceptance of women as co-workers. In Romans, he commends an entire list of women, including Junia, whom he calls “prominent among the apostles.” Nevertheless, several putdowns of women got placed in the texts and have remained as stumbling blocks for the unwary. …” More

(LCWR = Leadership Conference of Women Religious)

Past presidents

Friday, April 20th, 2012

taft2012DestinyOfTheRepublicEisenhowerbook

Here’s a link to the latest “One for the Books” column on Past Presidents.

Tweet to the fictional West Wing

Monday, March 26th, 2012

WestWingcast

Combine your Twitter obsession with your love for the TV show THE WEST WING by following the characters from the fictional White House.

Invasion of privacy

Thursday, March 22nd, 2012

In my opinion, this was one of the most important stories yesterday, and it got very little press. It indicates a dangerous allowance of invasion of privacy and the intimidation of desperate, vulnerable people:

Job seekers getting asked for Facebook passwords
By MANUEL VALDES and SHANNON MCFARLAND, Associated Press

blueblurrykeyboard

SEATTLE (AP) — When Justin Bassett interviewed for a new job, he expected the usual questions about experience and references. So he was astonished when the interviewer asked for something else: his Facebook username and password.

Bassett, a New York City statistician, had just finished answering a few character questions when the interviewer turned to her computer to search for his Facebook page. But she couldn’t see his private profile. She turned back and asked him to hand over his login information.

Bassett refused and withdrew his application, saying he didn’t want to work for a company that would seek such personal information. But as the job market steadily improves, other job candidates are confronting the same question from prospective employers, and some of them cannot afford to say no.

In their efforts to vet applicants, some companies and government agencies are going beyond merely glancing at a person’s social networking profiles and instead asking to log in as the user to have a look around.

“It’s akin to requiring someone’s house keys,” said Orin Kerr, a George Washington University law professor and former federal prosecutor who calls it “an egregious privacy violation.”

Questions have been raised about the legality of the practice, which is also the focus of proposed legislation in Illinois and Maryland that would forbid public agencies from asking for access to social networks.

Since the rise of social networking, it has become common for managers to review publically available Facebook profiles, Twitter accounts and other sites to learn more about job candidates. But many users, especially on Facebook, have their profiles set to private, making them available only to selected people or certain networks.

Companies that don’t ask for passwords have taken other steps — such as asking applicants to friend human resource managers or to log in to a company computer during an interview. Once employed, some workers have been required to sign nondisparagement agreements that ban them from talking negatively about an employer on social media.

Asking for a candidate’s password is more prevalent among public agencies, especially those seeking to fill law enforcement positions such as police officers or 911 dispatchers.

Back in 2010, Robert Collins was returning to his job as a security guard at the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services after taking a leave following his mother’s death. During a reinstatement interview, he was asked for his login and password, purportedly so the agency could check for any gang affiliations. He was stunned by the request but complied.

“I needed my job to feed my family. I had to,” he recalled,

After the ACLU complained about the practice, the agency amended its policy, asking instead for job applicants to log in during interviews.

“To me, that’s still invasive. I can appreciate the desire to learn more about the applicant, but it’s still a violation of people’s personal privacy,” said Collins, whose case inspired Maryland’s legislation.

Until last year, the city of Bozeman, Mont., had a long-standing policy of asking job applicants for passwords to their email addresses, social-networking websites and other online accounts.

And since 2006, the McLean County, Ill., sheriff’s office has been one of several Illinois sheriff’s departments that ask applicants to sign into social media sites to be screened.

Chief Deputy Rusty Thomas defended the practice, saying applicants have a right to refuse. But no one has ever done so. Thomas said that “speaks well of the people we have apply.”

When asked what sort of material would jeopardize job prospects, Thomas said “it depends on the situation” but could include “inappropriate pictures or relationships with people who are underage, illegal behavior.”

In Spotsylvania County, Va., the sheriff’s department asks applicants to friend background investigators for jobs at the 911 dispatch center and for law enforcement positions.

“In the past, we’ve talked to friends and neighbors, but a lot of times we found that applicants interact more through social media sites than they do with real friends,” said Capt. Mike Harvey. “Their virtual friends will know more about them than a person living 30 yards away from them.”

Harvey said investigators look for any “derogatory” behavior that could damage the agency’s reputation.

E. Chandlee Bryan, a career coach and co-author of the book “The Twitter Job Search Guide,” said job seekers should always be aware of what’s on their social media sites and assume someone is going to look at it.

Bryan said she is troubled by companies asking for logins, but she feels it’s not violation if an employer asks to see a Facebook profile through a friend request. And she’s not troubled by non-disparagement agreements.

“I think that when you work for a company, they are essentially supporting you in exchange for your work. I think if you’re dissatisfied, you should go to them and not on a social media site,” she said.

More companies are also using third-party applications to scour Facebook profiles, Bryan said. One app called BeKnown can sometimes access personal profiles, short of wall messages, if a job seeker allows it.

Sears is one of the companies using apps. An applicant has the option of logging into the Sears job site through Facebook by allowing a third-party application to draw information from the profile, such as friend lists.

Sears Holdings Inc. spokeswoman Kim Freely said using a Facebook profile to apply allows Sears to be updated on the applicant’s work history.

The company assumes “that people keep their social profiles updated to the minute, which allows us to consider them for other jobs in the future or for ones that they may not realize are available currently,” she said.

Giving out Facebook login information violates the social network’s terms of service. But those terms have no real legal weight, and experts say the legality of asking for such information remains murky.

The Department of Justice regards it as a federal crime to enter a social networking site in violation of the terms of service, but during recent congressional testimony, the agency said such violations would not be prosecuted.

But Lori Andrews, law professor at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law specializing in Internet privacy, is concerned about the pressure placed on applicants, even if they voluntarily provide access to social sites.

“Volunteering is coercion if you need a job,” Andrews said.

Neither Facebook nor Twitter responded to repeated requests for comment.

In New York, Bassett considered himself lucky that he was able to turn down the consulting gig at a lobbying firm.

“I think asking for account login credentials is regressive,” he said. “If you need to put food on the table for your three kids, you can’t afford to stand up for your belief.”

Channeling Al Green

Friday, January 20th, 2012

BarackObamaAlGreen

They said he wouldn’t do it: At the Apollo Theatre, the president channels the Rev. Al Green.

FLOTUS

Monday, January 16th, 2012

michelle_obamaI am a big fan of first lady Michelle Obama. She’s smart, classy, sassy, gorgeous, funny; she’s a wonderful ambassador for our country; and she has kick-butt arms!

And first ladies always get picked on — usually by the press. Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, Hillary Clinton — they all got bashed. Laura Bush had it fairly easy.

But this time, the first lady is being bashed by the author of a new book, “The Obamas.” I really don’t want to read the book, because this kind of blatant negative just-for-the-money putdown is anathema to me. So, instead, I’m going to show Michelle Obama in a positive light as often as I can.

(Photo of Michelle Obama from forcoloredgurls.com; the rest of the photos here are from the Associated Press.)

MObamaand2vets

First lady Michelle Obama, center, poses for a photo with U.S. Army Staff Sergeants Keisha Whitmore, left, and Tyeir Pritchard-Davis after Obama announced an initiative for more research on veterans medical care during a visit at Virginia Commonwealth University, Wednesday, Jan. 11, 2012, in Richmond, Va. The staff sergeants are based at Fort Lee in Petersburg, Va. (AP Photo/Richmond Times-Dispatch, P. Kevin Morley)

MObamaBET2012

BET honorees, from left, Tuskegee Airmen Colonel Charles McGee USAF Ret. and Dr. Roscoe C. Brown Jr., athlete Beverly Kearney, director Spike Lee, singer Mariah Carey and musician Stevie Wonder, pose with First Lady Michelle Obama during the BET Honors at the Warner Theatre in Washington on Saturday, Jan. 14, 2012. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Obamas2011

Dec. 14, 2011: President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama arrive on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari, File)

What did liberals do?

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012

What did liberals do that was so offensive to the Republican party?

I’ll tell you what they did.

Liberals got women the right to vote.

Liberals got African-Americans the right to vote.

Liberals created Social Security and lifted millions of elderly people out of poverty.

Liberals ended segregation.

Liberals passed the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act.

Liberals created Medicare.

Liberals passed the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act.

What did conservatives do?

They opposed them on every one of those things, every one.

So when you try to hurl that label at my feet, ‘Liberal,’ as if it were something to be ashamed of, something dirty, something to run away from, it won’t work, Senator. Because I will pick up that label and I will wear it as a badge of honor.”

— Lawrence O’Donnell Jr.

http://fortbenddemocrats.com/quotes/author/Lawrence%20O’Donnell%20Jr.-%20The%20West%20Wing

King supports Occupy movement

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

From Tweetbeat:

Novelist Stephen King and his wife Tabitha have released a statement supporting “Occupy Bangor” in Maine, where they live:

“It’s time for the wealthy to pay their fair share before the middle class becomes the forgotten class. And it’s time for the banks to give back what they were given. There are those in politics, particularly those on the conservative side, who can’t get enough of telling people that the wealthy one percent must not be taxed because doing so kills jobs. The real job-killers are corporate greed and political expediency. It’s time for working people in Maine and all across the country to take back the American dream.”

Socialist?

Thursday, October 20th, 2011

obamajesus

Hmmmm.

‘That is not a way of life at all’

Wednesday, September 28th, 2011

hungrychild“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.”

— Dwight D. Eisenhower (1890-1969),
34th president of the United States (1953-1961),
from a speech before the American
Society of Newspaper Editors, April 16, 1953

Can’t argue with that

Thursday, September 22nd, 2011

ElizabethWarrenlgtxt

Elizabeth Warren is just brilliant. I hope someday she’ll be president.

Tavis Smiley on poverty

Thursday, August 11th, 2011

Tavis Smiley appeared recently on CBS Sunday Morning, where he spoke brilliantly on “The Truth About Poverty in America”:

“I choose to identify with the underprivileged,
I choose to identify with the poor,
I choose to give my life for those
who have been left out
of the sunlight of opportunity.”
— Dr. Martin Luther King

In this current debate over deficit reduction, and in our political discourse in general, you almost never hear the word “poverty” or any serious talk about the poor in America. As Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. reminds us, at this critical moment in our history, we have a choice to make as Americans — we either choose to eradicate poverty or poverty just might eradicate us.

Every empire in history has either failed or faltered, but for some reason — be it our arrogance, our hubris, or our nationalism disguised as patriotism — we turn a blind eye to the growing chasm between the “have gots” and the “have nots.” One percent of the population owning and controlling more wealth than 90 percent of Americans is both dangerous and unsustainable.

At the heart of the problem is political cowardice.

As the 2012 race for the White House heats up, it’s worth remembering that in 2008, not once during three presidential debates did either candidate even utter the word “poverty.” And not much more has been said or done since then, even as the indiscriminant net of poverty ensnares even more Americans. Indeed, the new poor are the former middle class.

Somebody has to tell the truth about poverty in America. It is the telling of truth that allows suffering to speak.

Sadly, more and more children are making their way into the ranks of the poor; forced to surrender their life’s chances before they even know their life’s choices. Because the poor have no powerful lobby — no political clout — and no good cards in a deck already stacked against them.

In America today, we don’t just have a poverty of jobs — we have a poverty of affirmation, a poverty of opportunity, a poverty of optimism, and a poverty of hope.

In 1968, Robert Kennedy, then a candidate for president, embarked on a tour of some of the poorest and most forgotten places in America. The notion of a political figure — one so well-heeled and well-known — making a choice to reach out to the least among us was an inspiration for millions.

In this upcoming election cycle, let’s hope someone steps forward to speak on behalf of those most in need. They probably won’t … unless we demand that they do.